This is an old revision of the document!
Qc2 Flag Specification
DRAFT
fw
For flagging spatial analysis of the available observation data.
Controlflag Setting | Description |
---|---|
fw=0 | Ikke kontrollert |
fw=1 | Kontrollert. Funnet i orden |
fw=2 | Kontrollert. Observert verdis avvik fra beregnet verdi er større enn høy testverdi |
fw=3 | Kontrollert. Observert verdis avvik fra beregnet verdi er mindre enn lav testverdi |
fw=4 | Kontrollert. Observert verdis avvik fra beregnet verdi er større enn høyeste testverdi |
fw=5 | Kontrollert. Observert verdis avvik fra beregnet verdi er mindre enn laveste testverdi |
fw=6 | Original verdi mangler eller er forkastet av en annen QC2-kontroll. Interpolert/korrigert med beregnet verdi |
(fw=7 Vi vil vurdere om interpolasjonsmetodikken (fw-kontrollen) selv kan forkaste en verdi. Foreløpig er vi litt tvilende til det, men holder muligheten åpen.)
The beregnet verdi/calculated value is the model value provided by th Qc2 algorithm used. The algorithm used is recorded in the “cfailed” string.
… To do: parse all flag group responses and document.
At https://kvalobs.wiki.met.no/doku.php?id=kvoss:system:qc2:flag:regression > there are a lot of observations where useinfo(7) has been changed from a > positive value (3 or 4 - observasjon er meldt for tidlig/sent) into 0. > This looks like a bug to me. I guess you have done some kind of resetting of useinfo flags before running "setUseFlags(const kvControlInfo& cinfo) with the existing Qc2 logic turned on"? If so, useinfo(7)=3,4 should not be reset, because the only place where these values are set is when decoding the original message (the values are set by the decoder). The only values I have found for useinfo(7) in the Kvalobs database is 0, 3 and 4. Yes this explains a lot! I was just giving setUseFlags the value of the controlinfo and seeing what useinfo was generated without any prior initialisation of the useinfo. When I rerun the regression tests I will do something about this ... and maybe then the results will all be the same and it will be easier to later approve the update of the working libraries.r the I will update Flaggdokumentet with the new values for fw soon implies changes in setting of useinfo(2) also and will therefore take place after the implementation of 1272. Regarding the setUseFlags anticipation of the setting of user flags in response to QC2 controls, most of the logic is commented out in the operational code, as indicated below: bool kvControlInfo::qc2dDone() const { return false;//flag( f_fs ) or flag( f_ftime ) or flag( f_fw ) or flag( f_fstat ); } ... bool kvControlInfo::qc2mDone() const { return false;//flag( f_fclim ) or flag( f_fd ); } " An additional change is to alter the check for flag f_fs being set into checking for the specific values of f_s which QC2 alone is able to set. fs=1,2,3 should not imply qc2dDone=true, because fs=1,2,3 is set by QC1, not QC2. Similarly for the flag f_fd in qc2mDone. Pål Sannes wrote: > Then at > https://kvalobs.wiki.met.no/doku.php?id=kvoss:system:qc2:flag:regression > there are a lot of observations where useinfo(7) has been changed from a > positive value (3 or 4 - observasjon er meldt for tidlig/sent) into 0. > This looks like a bug to me. I guess you have done some kind of resetting of useinfo flags before running "setUseFlags(const kvControlInfo& cinfo) with the existing Qc2 logic turned on"? If so, useinfo(7)=3,4 should not be reset, because the only place where these values are set is when decoding the original message (the values are set by the decoder). The only values I have found for useinfo(7) in the Kvalobs database is 0, 3 and 4. Pål