Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bufr.pm:bufrextract.pl_help [2016-11-29 08:44:57]
pals created
+++ bufr.pm:bufrextract.pl_help [2022-05-31 09:29:31]
external edit
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
           [--ahl <ahl_regexp>]
           [--only_ahl] | [--without_ahl]
+          [--outfile <filename>]
           [--reuse_ahl n]
           [--help]
-          [--outfile <filename>]
           [--verbose n]
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
        --only_ahl         Extract AHLs only
        --without_ahl      Extract BUFR messages only
+       --outfile <filename>
+                          Will print to <filename> instead of STDOUT
        --reuse_ahl n  n=0 (default) AHL is considered belonging to a BUFR message
                           only if immediately preceding
@@ Line 20: / Line 22: @@
        --help             Display Usage and explain the options used. For even
                           more info you might prefer to consult perldoc bufrextract.pl
-       --outfile <filename>
-                          Will print to <filename> instead of STDOUT
        --verbose n        Set verbose level to n, 0<=n<=6 (default 0)
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
     CCCC=ENMI.
-    If the BUFR file is known to consist solely of GTS bulletins, you
+    If the BUFR file(s) are known to consist solely of GTS bulletins, you
-    probably should use "--reuse 1" when applying "--ahl", in order to
+    might consider setting "--reuse 1" when applying "--ahl", in order to
     extract all (and not only the first) BUFR messages in multi message
-    bulletins (such bulletins are very rare, though). Note that the
+    bulletins. Such bulletins are very rare nowadays, however, and see also
-    corresponding AHL is still extracted only once.
+    the "CAVEAT" for more on this option. Note that the corresponding AHL is
+    still extracted (and printed) only once.
     No bufrtables are needed for running bufrextract.pl, since section 4 in