Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
kvalobs:kvoss:meetings:20100110 [2010-01-11 15:02:36] matthiasm |
kvalobs:kvoss:meetings:20100110 [2022-05-31 09:29:32] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Participants: | Participants: | ||
- | Forfall: Paul | + | |
+ | Not present: Paul | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Issues discussed: ===== | ||
* Test with different kinds of precipitation data: Convective, terrain (complex/ | * Test with different kinds of precipitation data: Convective, terrain (complex/ | ||
- | | + | |
+ | | ||
* Convective case especially challenging: | * Convective case especially challenging: | ||
+ | |||
* Automatic QC2 should give better result than HQC --> Could this be tested? (Hypothetical HQC test dataset could be used and compared with automatic QC2) | * Automatic QC2 should give better result than HQC --> Could this be tested? (Hypothetical HQC test dataset could be used and compared with automatic QC2) | ||
+ | |||
* Tests of QC2 should be carried out using historic data. Results should be compared with measurements. | * Tests of QC2 should be carried out using historic data. Results should be compared with measurements. | ||
+ | |||
* We have enough data for extensive evaluation and reliable statistical error estimations. | * We have enough data for extensive evaluation and reliable statistical error estimations. | ||
- | | + | |
- | * Is QC2 giving better results than values of numerical models that are stored in KDVH. --> Test | + | |
+ | |||
+ | * Is QC2 giving better results than values of numerical models that are stored in KDVH. --> Test this | ||
+ | ===== Acceptance tests with different datasets: ===== | ||
- | Acceptance tests with different datasets/ | ||
- Precipitation type (convective/ | - Precipitation type (convective/ | ||
- Regions/ | - Regions/ |