Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- kvalobs:kvoss:meetings:20100110 [2010-01-11 15:02:36]
matthiasm
+++ kvalobs:kvoss:meetings:20100110 [2022-05-31 09:29:32]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== QC2 Acceptance Test & Other Possible Tests ======
-Subject: Acceptance test of precipitation re-distribution algorithms in QC2 (if precip. missing for >= 1 days)
-Participants: Per-Ove, Solfrid, Ole Einar, Matthias (author of this page)
-Forfall: Paul
-  * Test with different kinds of precipitation data: Convective, terrain (complex/flat), proximity to Swedish border
-  * Precipitation measurements have already 10% measurement inaccuracy; good result if we can achieve say 100% accuracy in estimated values
-  * Convective case especially challenging: Half of stations could have precipitation, other half not.
-  * Automatic QC2 should give better result than HQC --> Could this be tested? (Hypothetical HQC test dataset could be used and compared with automatic QC2)
-  * Tests of QC2 should be carried out using historic data. Results should be compared with measurements.
-  * We have enough data for extensive evaluation and reliable statistical error estimations.
-  * Should HQC still check results of automatic QC2 (probably not)
-  * Is QC2 giving better results than values of numerical models that are stored in KDVH. --> Test
-Acceptance tests with different datasets/precipitation types:
-  - Precipitation type (convective/frontal)
-  - Regions/topography/catchment areas
-  - Station edensity/coverage