clipc:evaluation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
clipc:evaluation [2015-07-14 12:41:57]
andreasd
clipc:evaluation [2022-05-31 09:29:31] (current)
Line 11: Line 11:
 {{:clipc:taylor_tasmin.png?direct&600|}} {{:clipc:taylor_tasmin.png?direct&600|}}
  
-Annual and seasonal biases of the raw and bias-corrected for the individual RCM runs are shown here:\\+Overall and seasonal biases of the raw and bias-corrected for the individual RCM runs are shown here:\\
 {{:clipc:bias_pr_EUR-44.pdf|}}\\ {{:clipc:bias_pr_EUR-44.pdf|}}\\
 {{:clipc:bias_tas_EUR-44.pdf|}}\\ {{:clipc:bias_tas_EUR-44.pdf|}}\\
Line 28: Line 28:
 {{:clipc:taylor_tasmin_EUR11.png?direct&600|}} {{:clipc:taylor_tasmin_EUR11.png?direct&600|}}
  
-Annual and seasonal biases of the raw and bias-corrected for the individual RCM runs are shown here:\\+Overall and seasonal biases of the raw and bias-corrected for the individual RCM runs are shown here:\\
 {{:clipc:bias_pr_EUR-11.pdf|}}\\ {{:clipc:bias_pr_EUR-11.pdf|}}\\
 {{:clipc:bias_tas_EUR-11.pdf|}}\\ {{:clipc:bias_tas_EUR-11.pdf|}}\\
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 ===== Summary ===== ===== Summary =====
-As expected, the bias-correction method reduces (but does not remove) the seasonal biases and removes the annual biases (almostcompletely for all variables.+As expected, the bias-correction method reduces (but does not remove) the seasonal biases and removes the overall biases almost completely for all variables
 +The remaining annual biases are due to the use of "only" 101 quantiles to estimate the empirical cumulative distribution functions within qmap. 
 +The additionally remaining seasonal biases are due to the calibration process which is carried out without splitting into seasons or months.
 ---- ----
- //[[andreas.dobler@met.no|Andreas Dobler]] 2015/07/10 15:03//+===== Impact on climate change signal ===== 
 +Within the CHASE-PL project, the same bias-correction method was used but with a different observational data set (for Poland only) and splitting into seasons for calibration.\\ 
 +{{:clipc:cc_pr_POL-05.pdf|Here}} you can see the impact of the method on the mean climate change signal of precipitation for the far (2071-2100) and near (2051-2070) future over Poland for the single models and the ensemble mean. 
 +---- 
 +//[[andreas.dobler@met.no|Andreas Dobler]] 2016/04/28 15:00// 
  
  • clipc/evaluation.1436877717.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2022-05-31 09:23:11
  • (external edit)