clipc:evaluation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
clipc:evaluation [2015-07-15 08:54:46]
andreasd 		clipc:evaluation [2016-04-28 13:43:38]
andreasd added impact section
Line 39: Line 39:
 The additionally remaining seasonal biases are due to the calibration process which is carried out without splitting into seasons or months. The additionally remaining seasonal biases are due to the calibration process which is carried out without splitting into seasons or months.
 ---- ----
-//[[andreas.dobler@met.no|Andreas Dobler]] 2015/07/15 11:00//+===== Impact on climate change signal ===== 
 +Within the CHASE-PL project, the same bias-correction method was used but with a different observational data set and splitting into seasons for calibration.\\ 
 +{{:clipc:cc_pr_POL-05.pdf|Here}} you can see the impact of the method on the mean climate change signal of precipitation for the far (2071-2100) and near (2051-2070) future for the single models and the ensemble mean. 
 +---- 
 +//[[andreas.dobler@met.no|Andreas Dobler]] 2016/04/28 15:00//
  
  
  • clipc/evaluation.txt
  • Last modified: 2022-05-31 09:29:31
  • (external edit)