bufr.pm:bufrdump.pl_buoy2 [wiki.met.no]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.

Notice that for these BUFR messages (contained in IOB bulletins fetched from the GTS), the output from bufrdump.pl with **%%--%%obstype surface** is exactly as if option **%%--%%obstype** was not used at all. The reason is that these BUFR messages have data category 1 ('surface data'), while data sub-category is set to missing value, making it hard for bufrdump.pl to deduce that sub-surface data is also present without being explicitely told so.

Output:
<file>
buoy_id=62775
obstime=2011-08-26 04:30:00
type=Automatic
lon=-2.28300
lat=43.71240
height=0
TW=22.2

buoy_id=52087
obstime=2011-08-26 00:00:00
type=Automatic
lon=136.49274
lat=7.86594
height=0
DD=168
FF=7.4
TA=28.7
TW=28.9
UU=80
PR=1009.4

buoy_id=31051
obstime=2011-08-26 04:00:00
type=Automatic
lon=-44.92644
lat=-25.28061
height=0
DD=279
FF=0.0
TA=21.1
TD=19.8
TW=21.2
PR=1019.2
PW=13
HW=2.6
</file>