Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
kvalobs:kvoss:system:qc2:test:algorithms:diptest [2011-04-12 21:47:48] paule |
kvalobs:kvoss:system:qc2:test:algorithms:diptest [2022-05-31 09:29:32] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Output of various tests. The latest is always posted at the top of the page. | Output of various tests. The latest is always posted at the top of the page. | ||
| - | * ... | + | {{kvalobs: |
| - | * ... | + | |
| - | * ... | + | |
| - | * ... | + | |
| * Also see the application of [[https:// | * Also see the application of [[https:// | ||
| ====== Simulated Test Data after Flag 9.7 Updates ====== | ====== Simulated Test Data after Flag 9.7 Updates ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Review** | ||
| + | |||
| + | The last results of testing this algorithm are provided below (subsections labeled " | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The results of the DipTest with regards the flags set at the final step and the interpolation performed are in general OK but the applicability of the DipTest to all of the parameters originally proposed should be checked. | ||
| + | * For example, review of the results sets suggests that paramid=104 should not be checked and should be removed from the paramid listing. (Difficult to correctly handle the periods where the bucket is manually emptied in the time series). | ||
| + | * For some examples the flagging apears not to be correctly set prior to the DipTest (e.g. useinfo not set according to teh controlinfo), | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Results** | ||
| The following data was taken from 2008 and then modified to create and emphasise some dips. Controlflags may also have been modified to ensure that the DipTest ran - this simulation is just to get some more DipTest results to look at, but simulating data may result in impossible flag settings etc ... so please be wary. | The following data was taken from 2008 and then modified to create and emphasise some dips. Controlflags may also have been modified to ensure that the DipTest ran - this simulation is just to get some more DipTest results to look at, but simulating data may result in impossible flag settings etc ... so please be wary. | ||
| Line 265: | Line 273: | ||
| The main change in the flag document is: | The main change in the flag document is: | ||
| - | useinfo(2) settes til 2 hvis\\ fagg=3 eller %%((%%fr=4 eller fr=5) og fcombi !=1,2) eller (fcc=3, fcc=4, fcc=6, fcc=7, fcp=3, fcp=4, fcp=6, fcp=7, fs=3, fw=4, fw=5, fpos=3, fstat=2 eller fd=3) | + | ^Previous ^ Version 9.7 ^ |
| - | + | |useinfo(2) settes til 2 hvis fagg=3 eller %%((%%fr=4 eller fr=5) og fcombi !=1,2) eller (fcc=3, fcc=4, fcc=6, fcc=7, fcp=3, fcp=4, fcp=6, fcp=7, fs=3, fw=4, fw=5, fpos=3, fstat=2 eller fd=3) | useinfo(2) settes til 2 hvis fagg=3 eller %%((%%fr=4 eller fr=5) og fcombi !=1,2) eller (fcc=3, fcc=4, fcc=6, fcc=7, fcp=3, fcp=4, fcp=6, fcp=7, fs=3, fw=4, fw=5, fpos=3, fstat=2 eller fd=3) | | |
| - | useinfo(2) settes til 2 hvis\\ fagg=3 eller %%((%%fr=4 eller fr=5) og fcombi !=1,2) eller (fcc=3, fcc=4, fcc=6, fcc=7, fcp=3, fcp=4, fcp=6, fcp=7, fs=3, fw=4, fw=5, fpos=3, fstat=2 eller fd=3) | + | | useinfo(2) settes til 1 hvis fagg=2, fr=2, fr=3, fcc=2, fcp=2, fs=2**, fs=4, fs=5**, fs=7, fw=2, fw=3, fclim=2 eller fcombi=2 | useinfo(2) settes til 1 hvis fagg=2, fr=2, fr=3, fcc=2, fcp=2, fs=2, fs=7, fw=2, fw=3, fclim=2 eller fcombi=2 | |
| + | |useinfo(2) settes til 0 hvis fagg=1, fr=1, fcc=1, fcp=1, fs=1, fw=1, fpos=1, fstat=1, fclim=1, fd=1 eller fcombi=1 | useinfo(2) settes til 0 hvis fagg=1, fr=1, fcc=1, fcp=1, fs=1**, fs=4**, fw=1, fpos=1, fstat=1, fclim=1, fd=1 eller fcombi=1. | | ||
| - | useinfo(2) settes til 1 hvis\\ & | + | exact diff here: https://kvalobs.wiki.met.no/doku.php?id=kvalobs: |
| - | useinfo(2) settes til 0 hvis\\ & | + | https:// |
| + | The example below illustrates useinfo(2) being reset to 0 when fs is set to 4. | ||
| < | < | ||