Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
kvalobs:kvoss:system:qc2:requirements:nordklim:qc2sciencetasks [2009-12-06 21:10:46] paule |
kvalobs:kvoss:system:qc2:requirements:nordklim:qc2sciencetasks [2022-05-31 09:29:32] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Qc2 Scientific Tasks ====== | ====== Qc2 Scientific Tasks ====== | ||
- | **Status** //Draft// | + | |
+ | |||
+ | ====== Verification/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |Original testing was carried out for data obtained between March 2007 and December 2007 giving rise to a comparison to real observations with simulated test data (constructed from real observations): | ||
+ | | ... as well as a comparison to the results of HQC: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Short Term Tasks** | ||
+ | ^Action ^Resposnsible ^Due Date ^ | ||
+ | |Build tool (with documentation) that for a given interval will automatically generate test data by computing accumulations to allow fast analysis on the virtual test machine|IT-gruppa/ | ||
+ | |Identify scenarios for testing the algorithm: e.g. convective vs frontal precipiation systems, specific regions in Norway. Also tests cases that compare all dry or all wet with mixed etc. |SKF |20100118 | | ||
+ | |Run Tests (NB incorporate some cases into the Acceptance Test File) Write test report. |IT-gruppa/ | ||
+ | |Analysis of results and make recommendation for Qc2 RARR_24 Operational Deployment, include a consideration of optimal interpolation method taking into account the balance with the number of corrections obtained (i.e. if a model value is computed sometimes depends on the interpolation method chosen and if the required set of neighbours exists). The recommendation shall also stipulate decisions like only applying to all wet or all dry conditions, height normalisation etc. |All |20100207 | | ||
+ | | -oOo- | -oOo- | -oOo- | | ||
+ | |||
+ | The action deadlines above provide scheduling for completion of each task. Actual hours requested from SKF (for the identification of scenarios, analysis of results, iteration on testing and recommendations: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Other Short Term Tasks ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ^Task ^Estimate of human-hours ^ | ||
+ | |**Specification of a Qc2 guideline document.** | - | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Specification of rules to follow in performing interpolation (preferred methods, number of points)| 0.5 weeks | | ||
+ | | Identification of proxies that may be used to discriminate between different weather conditions| 2 weeks | | ||
+ | | Checks that can be run on spatial datasets that involve the comparison of different parameters.| 1 week | | ||
+ | | Definition of correlation analysis techniques that may be applied to identify, for example, the best neighbours for a given station (this could evolve in a Qc2 station list (always evolving as correlation techniques are re-run) as well as input to general Space Check methods).| 2 weeks | | ||
+ | | -oOo- | -oOo- | | ||
+ | |||
+ | **NB** In total 8 weeks work is defined in the two sections above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Longer Term Tasks ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ^Task ^Estimate of human-hours ^ | ||
+ | |**Definition and documentation of new algorithms and Qc2 controls.** Specification of the algorithm and prototyping with Scientific software suite (e.g. R) and then following up the development carried out by IT-Responsible (reviewing tests etc), ... | - | | ||
+ | | e.g. please see Section 2.5 [[https:// | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | -oOo- | -oOo- | | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== //Original Thoughts - Pre Teleconference 20091207// ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | - to verify the results of QC2-checks - the redistribution to RR_24. Confirmation of the quality of results - rewiew of statistics? Or a separate analysis: Dataset should cover all country and both convective and frontal precipitation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | - to take active part in the general space-check algorithm. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - others? | ||
Specification of algorithms and general guidelines. | Specification of algorithms and general guidelines. | ||
- Defintion of algorithms | - Defintion of algorithms | ||
- | * Tests for interdependence, | + | * Tests for interdependence, |
* Strategies for interpolation in both space and time, | * Strategies for interpolation in both space and time, | ||
- | * Use of station aspect, | + | * Use of station aspect, |
- | * etc ... | + | |
+ | * Other statistical tests, regression techniques, appropriate residuals analysis, etc ... | ||
+ | | ||
- General guidelines | - General guidelines | ||
* Optimum number of points to include in an interpolation, | * Optimum number of points to include in an interpolation, | ||
- | * Recommended statistics (e.g. monthly | + | * Recommended statistics (e.g. monthly |
- | * Statistical checks to use for checking the performance of interpolation methods (e.g. see [[https:// | + | * Statistical checks to use for checking the performance of interpolation methods (e.g. see [[https:// |
- | | + | * Identification of regions that are best handled separately, e.g. North, South, East, West, Coastal, Interior, and the region variation with season |
+ | | ||
+ | - Other | ||
* Use of semivariograms in general as a method to assess spatial homogeneity | * Use of semivariograms in general as a method to assess spatial homogeneity | ||
* Automating kriging methods: calculation of semivariogram, | * Automating kriging methods: calculation of semivariogram, | ||
* Boundary detection | * Boundary detection | ||
- | * First defintion | + | * First definition |
+ | * General advice on priorities on particular algorithms etc. to develop | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||