Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
emep:emep-experts:tfmmtrendeurodelta [2017-02-22 14:10:05]
augustin.colette@ineris.fr [Anthropogenic Emissions]
emep:emep-experts:tfmmtrendeurodelta [2022-05-31 09:29:32] (current)
Line 6: Line 6:
   * Marta Garcia Vivanco (CIEMAT/CHIMERE);   * Marta Garcia Vivanco (CIEMAT/CHIMERE);
   * Mihaela Mircea, Gino Briganti, Andrea Cappelletti, Mario Adani, Massimo D'Isidoro, Antonio Piersanti, Luisella Ciancarella (ENEA/MINNI);   * Mihaela Mircea, Gino Briganti, Andrea Cappelletti, Mario Adani, Massimo D'Isidoro, Antonio Piersanti, Luisella Ciancarella (ENEA/MINNI);
-  * Giancarlo Ciarelli, Sebnem Aksoyoglu (PSI/CAMx); +  * Sebnem Aksoyoglu (PSI/CAMx);
-  * Guido Pirovano (RSE/CAMx); +
   * Kees Cuvelier (exJRC/TrendTool);    * Kees Cuvelier (exJRC/TrendTool); 
-  * Johannes Bieser (HZG/CMAQ);  
   * Yelva Roustan & Valentin Raffort (CEREA/Polair3D);    * Yelva Roustan & Valentin Raffort (CEREA/Polair3D); 
   * Hilde Fagerli & Svetlana Tsyro (met.no/EMEP),    * Hilde Fagerli & Svetlana Tsyro (met.no/EMEP), 
 +  * Camilla Andersson (SMHI/MATCH). 
   * Maria-Teresa Pay (BSC/CMAQ);    * Maria-Teresa Pay (BSC/CMAQ); 
 +  * Noelia Otero Felipe, Kathleen Mar (IASS/WRF-Chem)
   * Martijn Schaap (TNO/LOTOS).   * Martijn Schaap (TNO/LOTOS).
  
Line 24: Line 24:
 In contrast with other model intercomparison initiatives, the Eurodelta framework is quite constrained, with tight standards on the consistency of the setup of participating models in order to allow pointing out the geophysical processed bearing upon the modelled response. In the present scoping paper, we summarize the main features of the Eurodelta 3 phase II modelling exercise.  In contrast with other model intercomparison initiatives, the Eurodelta framework is quite constrained, with tight standards on the consistency of the setup of participating models in order to allow pointing out the geophysical processed bearing upon the modelled response. In the present scoping paper, we summarize the main features of the Eurodelta 3 phase II modelling exercise. 
  
 +**NOTE: An updated description of the present modelling plan is now available as a GMDD paper:
 +
 +http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2016-309/
 +**
 ===== Modelling experiment ===== ===== Modelling experiment =====
  
Line 74: Line 78:
 The volume of data for the meteorological forcing is at least 50G/yr (estimate for the list of variables required for Chimere ). The data is available at: The volume of data for the meteorological forcing is at least 50G/yr (estimate for the list of variables required for Chimere ). The data is available at:
  
-[[https://esgf.extra.cea.fr/thredds/fileServer/store/colettea/EURODELTA/METEO/]]. +[[https://esgf.extra.cea.fr/thredds/catalog/store/colettea/EURODELTA/METEO/catalog.html]]. 
  
 ===== Biogenic and natural Emissions ===== ===== Biogenic and natural Emissions =====
Line 121: Line 125:
 For ozone, a 3D climatology based on observational vertical profiles is consolidated and updated by J. Logan et al. Proposal is to use this 3D climatology in conjunction with a temporal (monthly) variation over the past 20 years. Long lived species (CH4) are held fixed in the simulation. A few other species such as sulphate, ammonium, nitrate and sea salt are also provided. Dust derived from a global model are also given. Particulate species are split between the fine (0-2.5µm) and coarse fraction (2.5-10.0µm) with the following median diameter: 0.33e-6 m for all fine, 3.0e-6 m for coarse nitrate, 4.8e-6 m for coarse sea salt, 5.0e-6 m for coarse dust. The molar mass to be used for the conversion of dust to µg/m3 is 200g/mole. For ozone, a 3D climatology based on observational vertical profiles is consolidated and updated by J. Logan et al. Proposal is to use this 3D climatology in conjunction with a temporal (monthly) variation over the past 20 years. Long lived species (CH4) are held fixed in the simulation. A few other species such as sulphate, ammonium, nitrate and sea salt are also provided. Dust derived from a global model are also given. Particulate species are split between the fine (0-2.5µm) and coarse fraction (2.5-10.0µm) with the following median diameter: 0.33e-6 m for all fine, 3.0e-6 m for coarse nitrate, 4.8e-6 m for coarse sea salt, 5.0e-6 m for coarse dust. The molar mass to be used for the conversion of dust to µg/m3 is 200g/mole.
  
-The data is available athttp://dods.extra.cea.fr/store/colettea/EURODELTA/BOUN_COND/Obs_EMEP.tar+The data is available as Obs_EMEP_1990-2010.tar under https://esgf.extra.cea.fr/thredds/catalog/store/colettea/EURODELTA/BOUN_COND/catalog.html 
  
 The brief documentation is provided here {{:emep:emep-experts:readme_bcs_emep.pdf|}} The brief documentation is provided here {{:emep:emep-experts:readme_bcs_emep.pdf|}}
Line 129: Line 134:
  
 The Climate-Chemistry Model Initiative is currently undertaking global atmospheric chemistry reanalyses over the 1960-2010 time period (Eyring, 2014) based on the MACC City emissions (Granier et al., 2011). We propose to use the CamChem member of the ensemble (Lamarque et al., 2012) produced by Simone Tilmes at NCAR provided by Katerina Sindelarova (katerina.sindelarova@latmos.ipsl.fr) and Claire Granier (cgranier@latmos.ipsl.fr) at LATMOS/IPSL.  The Climate-Chemistry Model Initiative is currently undertaking global atmospheric chemistry reanalyses over the 1960-2010 time period (Eyring, 2014) based on the MACC City emissions (Granier et al., 2011). We propose to use the CamChem member of the ensemble (Lamarque et al., 2012) produced by Simone Tilmes at NCAR provided by Katerina Sindelarova (katerina.sindelarova@latmos.ipsl.fr) and Claire Granier (cgranier@latmos.ipsl.fr) at LATMOS/IPSL. 
-The data is available at:   +The data is available as CAM4CHEM_CCMI.tar:   
-http://dods.extra.cea.fr/store/colettea/EURODELTA/BOUN_COND/+https://esgf.extra.cea.fr/thredds/catalog/store/colettea/EURODELTA/BOUN_COND/catalog.html 
  
 Validation of this global reanalysis is ongoing, but the preliminary results are encouraging as illustrated in the Figure below  showing the ozone trend at the Mace Head station. Validation of this global reanalysis is ongoing, but the preliminary results are encouraging as illustrated in the Figure below  showing the ozone trend at the Mace Head station.
  • emep/emep-experts/tfmmtrendeurodelta.1487772605.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2022-05-31 09:23:15
  • (external edit)