Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
ecoop-river:description [2007-10-15 21:08:54] bruceh |
ecoop-river:description [2022-05-31 09:29:32] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Task T2.5 description from Annex I ====== | ||
| - | ===== Activity description (Annex I 6.1) ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | **T2.5 - Establish a pan-EU data base for river run-off** | ||
| - | |||
| - | Hackett Bruce (MET-NO) - AZTI-Tecnalia, | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Objectives**: | ||
| - | the European coastal seas and providing them to coastal and shelf seas monitoring and forecasting | ||
| - | services. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Description**: | ||
| - | forecasting system. The activities are: identifying the relevant data sources and their providers | ||
| - | (catalogue), | ||
| - | and putting into effect actual data streams for the major sources. This work is necessary for ECOOP | ||
| - | because fresh water fluxes to the coastal seas, and the accompanying nutrient and pollutant loads, | ||
| - | are important for accurate monitoring and forecasting the coastal zone ecosystem, pollutant fate as | ||
| - | well as for coastal flood management. Observing systems are fragmented, even within nations, and | ||
| - | the data are difficult to access, especially in near-real-time (NRT). Efforts towards integrating | ||
| - | observations have been mainly focused on hydrology and river flooding, not coastal monitoring. | ||
| - | Consequently, | ||
| - | runoff, such as climatologies. Integration is necessary since fresh water effects on the coastal seas | ||
| - | are intrinsically trans-boundary. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Given the fragmented state of the European river observing system, this task will work through the | ||
| - | five EuroGOOS regional associations: | ||
| - | GOOS. It will be most efficient to exploit the national contact networks represented by the | ||
| - | association memberships. The task team therefore includes a key member from each regional | ||
| - | association plus a task leader. Each regional partner will liaise closely with their association | ||
| - | membership in carrying out the Work. This will ensure that the resulting data provision system is | ||
| - | properly tuned to the needs of the regional users and that it will optimally benefit those users. This | ||
| - | approach builds on early initiatives within some of the associations, | ||
| - | objectives has been started in NOOS as a "best endeavours" | ||
| - | archived and on-line data, volume flux, nutrient and pollutant loads, but the focus will be on | ||
| - | implementing a NRT data access to fresh water volume flux, since this is the basic time-critical data | ||
| - | stream. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **S2.5.1**: Assessment of existing river run-off data | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Objectives**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Description**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **S2.5.2**: Interfacing to ECOOP Data Management system | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Objectives**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Description**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **S2.5.3**: Implementation of initial data sets in ECOOP Data Management System | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Objectives**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Description**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Work Package Description (Annex I 8.5) ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | **T2.5 - Establish a pan-EU data base for river run-off** | ||
| - | |||
| - | Hackett Bruce (MET-NO) - AZTI-Tecnalia, | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Evaluate the river runoff data, regional and pan-European, | ||
| - | * Investigate the availability of both archived time series and data sources with near-real-time (NRT). | ||
| - | * Use as an important source of information the Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC). Add additional information from the regional association memberships. | ||
| - | * Catalogue the information to be available to coastal users. | ||
| - | * Establish an optimal list of observation stations for rivers influencing the coastal and regional seas (ECOOP River Station Lists). | ||
| - | * Define an optimal list of the initial NRT data sets for the “ECOOP Data Management System” . | ||
| - | * Clarify data policy issues within the various regions; | ||
| - | * Define data transfer procedures from data providers to the ECOOP DMS; | ||
| - | * Adopt data formats and procedures defined for the ECOOP DMS; | ||
| - | * Clarify data exchange requirements in the regional associations; | ||
| - | *Initial tests of the data flow procedures on representative sources in each region. | ||
| - | * Contact identified data providers, both directly and through national members of the regional EuroGOOS associations, | ||
| - | * Identify a test provider able to provide NRT data early in the project period. Test the data acquisition and interfacing procedures (cf. subtask 2.5.2) on this data stream. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **S2.5.1**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Evaluate the river runoff data, regional and pan-European, | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Investigate the availability of both archived time series and data sources with near-real-time (NRT). | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Use as an important source of information the Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC). Add additional information from the regional association memberships. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Catalogue the information to be available to coastal users. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Establish an optimal list of observation stations for rivers influencing the coastal and regional seas (ECOOP River Station Lists). | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Define an optimal list of the initial NRT data sets for the “ECOOP Data Management System" | ||